Logistics control tower
Logistics software for dispatch, shipment visibility and operational control
We design control towers for planning, assignment, hub operations, in-transit events, delivery, and proof of delivery.
Regional event network · Illustrative
- Current event
- Out for last-mile delivery
- Source system
- Driver app
- Assigned role
- Last-mile courier
- Freshness / exception
- Current
Illustrative event network. Route, ETA, tracking freshness, and location accuracy depend on carriers, devices, mapping providers, connectivity, and source data.
Shipment event river
In Transit
Line-haul departed
- Source
- Carrier
- Timestamp
- T+58m
- Quality
- Delayed
Dispatch board
Driver / vehicle lanes
Next task: No queued stop
Next task: STOP-B queued
Next task: No queued stop
Unassigned queue
Warehouse scan flow
Workflow model / illustrative scanner UI · PKG-DEMO-774
Scanner device mock
Event queue
- PKG-DEMO-774 · Inbound scan
Illustrative scanner workflow model, not a claim of specific barcode hardware support.
Exception radar
Exception queue · Missed scan
SHP-DEMO-2057
Hub scanner · Owner: Dispatcher
Manual scan reconciliation at next hub.
Category positions reflect representative operational states, not measured incident frequency.
Proof of delivery evidence
Delivery timeline · SHP-DEMO-2048
- 1Out for deliveryT+96m
- 2Arrived at destinationT+108m
- 3DeliveredT+110m
Recipient state: Recipient verified in demo
- Delivery ref
- POD-DEMO-2048
- Timestamp
- T+110m
- Geocode
- Location reference available
- Signature
- Photo
Carrier & aggregator boundary network
Control Tower
Event Model
- Inbound / outbound
- Status milestones, exceptions / Shipment manifest
- Ack / retry expectation
- Webhook ack within provider SLA
- Source-quality caveat
- Varies by carrier integration maturity
- Owner of truth
- Carrier
AI assist — human review
Source event bundle
- SHP-DEMO-2057: missed scan at LM-7
- Last confirmed event: hub sort T+41m
Generated suggestion / draft
- Likely cause: last-mile scan gap. Suggest dispatcher confirm with courier before escalation.
Human action
Not autonomous dispatch. ETA messages depend on available events and provider quality; disputed POD requires human review; no route-optimization guarantee.
Operational health ribbon
Carrier connectivity · Degraded
One carrier webhook integration is intermittently timing out.
Owner: Integrations
Control tower stack
System bands
Provider & delivery boundaries
- We do not claim guaranteed real-time tracking, guaranteed route optimization, or guaranteed delivery times.
- We do not claim fuel savings percentages, fake fleet size, or fake logistics clients.
- Tracking accuracy depends on devices, carriers, mapping providers, connectivity, and integration data quality.
- We do not invent clients, transaction volumes, order volumes, or performance metrics.
Exception & help topics
Do you guarantee route optimization or delivery times?
No. Routes and ETAs depend on mapping providers, traffic, devices, and carrier data—we engineer for visibility, not guaranteed optimization.
Can you build driver mobile apps?
Yes, using React Native, Flutter, or Firebase mobile platform patterns when field capture and notifications require native UX.
Will tracking always be real-time?
No. Real-time accuracy depends on connectivity, device battery, and carrier event quality.
Do you integrate maps and carriers?
Yes, through explicit provider contracts with documented limitations on ETA and route quality.
What should we implement first?
Many networks start with dispatch plus driver tasks or a customer visibility portal, then expand warehouse and fleet modules.
Plan a logistics control tower
Describe your hubs, fleet, and carrier mix—we will map event models and integrations without route or delivery guarantees.